This
past week in Latin American Civilization we have been discussing Esteban
Echevarria's "The Slaughterhouse" and Domingo Faustino Sarmiento's Facundo: Civilizacion y Barbarie. Both readings comment on Buenos Aires and the
separation between Federalists and Unitarians in Argentina. After reading “The
Slaughterhouse” I told my group about how I couldn’t help but draw comparisons
between Echevarria’s short story and another short story I read in high school
titled “The Lottery.” “The Lottery” follows the story of a small town where all
citizens must participate in a lottery. Throughout the story it is unclear what
winning the lottery means but it is made clear that town attendance is
incredibly important. When the winner for the lottery is drawn, it turns out to
be one of the characters whose life we had been following up until that point.
The town leaders then state that the children should “go first” and the
children being to throw rocks at the character. It then becomes clear that the “winner”
of the lottery is stoned to death by the other townspeople. The lottery is
about why we follow tradition but a parallel can be drawn between that short
story and “The Slaughterhouse” in the blind willingness of the masses to commit
atrocities and overlook brutal violence for seemingly unjustifiable reasons. “The
Lottery” cites tradition as a reason for the townspeople’s’ brutality but “The
Slaughterhouse” cites the political divide and the leaders of the Federalist
party for the unprovoked violence of the masses. I think that both readings
offer an interesting view on some of the ways in which humans justify their
actions and both bring forward the question: what am I blindly following do to
tradition or authority?
No comments:
Post a Comment